See My Latest Article on HelloNation
PFAS are a large group of manufactured chemicals that can persist in the environment and move through water systems. Understanding where they come from, how they may affect health, and what water testing and treatment can—and cannot—show helps households make informed decisions.
What are PFAS?
PFAS stands for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. The term describes thousands of related chemicals used since the mid-20th century because they resist heat, water, grease, and stains.
Some PFAS have been used in:
- Firefighting foams
- Water- and stain-resistant fabrics
- Nonstick coatings
- Grease-resistant food packaging
- Certain industrial processes
- Specialty manufacturing products
PFAS are often called “forever chemicals” because many break down very slowly. Their persistence means they can remain in soil, sediment, groundwater, surface water, and living organisms for long periods.
Not every PFAS behaves exactly the same way. PFOA and PFOS are among the most studied, but testing programs may look for a much larger group of compounds. A result showing that one PFAS was not detected does not necessarily mean every PFAS was tested.
How can PFAS affect water quality?
PFAS generally do not change the appearance, smell, or taste of water. Clear water with no unusual odor can still contain measurable amounts, which is why laboratory analysis is necessary.
PFAS can enter water through industrial releases, firefighting activities, waste disposal, contaminated soil, consumer products, and certain manufacturing operations. In some locations, the chemicals have moved from soil into groundwater or have traveled through surface-water systems.
Dodge City has a dry climate, significant agricultural activity, and a water system that depends on carefully managed local infrastructure. Those conditions do not automatically indicate a PFAS problem, but they make routine monitoring, source protection, and accurate public reporting important. Local water quality can also vary between the public water supply and private wells.
Are PFAS in the public water supply?
The most useful answer comes from the current Consumer Confidence Report and PFAS-specific monitoring results for the public water system.
The 2024 water quality report for Dodge City stated that PFAS testing conducted under the federal Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule found no PFAS detected in the sampled public drinking water. That finding applies to the samples and compounds included in that testing program. It should not be interpreted as proof that PFAS can never be present or that every possible PFAS compound was measured.
Monitoring requirements can change as federal and state programs develop. Kansas water systems may also have scheduled PFAS sampling separate from the annual report. Residents should review the newest water quality report available rather than relying only on an older result.
A “non-detect” result means the chemical was not found above the laboratory’s reporting level. It does not mean the water contains absolutely zero molecules of the substance.
What health effects are associated with PFAS?
Health research has linked long-term exposure to certain PFAS with effects involving the immune system, liver, cholesterol, development, and pregnancy-related outcomes. Researchers continue to study possible relationships with additional conditions, including some cancers.
Risk depends on several factors:
- The specific PFAS involved
- The concentration in the water
- How often exposure occurs
- How long exposure continues
- Whether exposure also comes from food, dust, consumer products, or other sources
- Individual characteristics such as age and health status
The presence of a chemical does not automatically mean that illness will occur. Risk assessment considers both the hazard of a substance and the amount and duration of exposure.
Infants, children, pregnant people, and individuals with certain health concerns may wish to discuss persistent exposure questions with a healthcare professional. Drinking-water testing can help clarify whether a household source requires further attention.
What drinking-water limits apply?
In April 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency finalized a national drinking-water regulation covering six PFAS or PFAS groupings. The rule includes limits of 4 parts per trillion for PFOA and PFOS, limits of 10 parts per trillion for PFHxS, PFNA, and GenX chemicals, and a hazard-index approach for mixtures of certain PFAS.
A part per trillion is an extremely small concentration—roughly comparable to a few seconds in a million years. Detecting a chemical at a very low level does not by itself establish a health emergency, but the low limits reflect concerns about long-term exposure and the difficulty of eliminating these persistent compounds from the environment.
Public water systems have monitoring, reporting, and compliance timelines under the federal rule. Requirements and implementation details can change, so residents should use current federal, Kansas, and local water-quality information when interpreting results.
How are PFAS removed from drinking water?
PFAS treatment is possible, but not every water filter removes PFAS effectively. Common treatment approaches include:
- Granular activated carbon
- Reverse osmosis
- Ion-exchange systems
Performance depends on the specific chemical, water chemistry, flow rate, filter design, and maintenance schedule. A filter may reduce some PFAS but not others. Filters can also become less effective as they fill with contaminants.
For household use, look for independent certification specifically addressing PFAS reduction. General claims such as “purifies water,” “removes chemicals,” or “improves taste” do not prove PFAS performance.
Reverse-osmosis systems may generate wastewater and require replacement filters or membranes. Activated-carbon systems also require timely replacement. A poorly maintained device may provide less protection than expected and can create other water-quality concerns.
Should residents test their water?
Testing may be reasonable when a household uses a private well, has a known nearby source of contamination, has received a public health notice, or wants information about a specific exposure concern.
Private wells are not monitored in the same way as regulated public water systems. Well owners are responsible for arranging testing and maintaining the well, pressure tank, treatment equipment, and plumbing.
PFAS testing should be performed by a qualified laboratory using an appropriate analytical method. Because PFAS can contaminate sampling equipment and containers, the laboratory’s instructions should be followed carefully. Avoid using waterproof clothing, cosmetics, treated materials, or fluoropolymer-based equipment near the sample.
A single test is a snapshot. If results are elevated or inconsistent, additional sampling may help determine whether the finding is persistent, seasonal, or related to sampling conditions.
Does boiling remove PFAS?
Boiling does not reliably remove PFAS. Because these chemicals are not destroyed by ordinary household boiling, evaporation can leave them behind and may increase their concentration as water volume decreases.
Heating water is useful for killing many microorganisms, but it is not a PFAS treatment method. Households concerned about PFAS should rely on properly selected and maintained treatment equipment rather than boiling.
What should households look for in a water report?
A water report should be read for more than a single contaminant number. Check:
- The year of the report
- Whether results are from the public system or a private source
- Which PFAS compounds were included
- The laboratory reporting level
- Whether results were listed as detected or non-detected
- Any violations, advisories, or follow-up monitoring
- Whether treatment changes are planned
For area households, the annual public water report is a useful starting point, while private-well owners may need separate laboratory testing. PFAS concerns are best addressed through verified sampling, careful interpretation, and treatment equipment selected for the specific compounds involved.